Sunday, January 10, 2016

Slate article of David Auerbach of November 12, 2015



HEALTH AND MEDICINE EXPLAINED.

NOV. 12 2015 5:40 AM

Facilitated Communication Is a Cult That Won’t Die

This discredited technique for communicating with profoundly disabled people is being pushed into public schools. 



[comment of Arthur Golden posted Wednesday, December 23, 2015 at 11:58 PM Israel time]

After finally getting a new computer, I have right now finished reading the article and the comments.

IDEOMOTOR EFFECT – I have read over 100 studies of Facilitated Communication (actual experiments or reviews of experiments) over the past 10 years and although many claim there is the ideomotor effect, I do not remember any studies that PROVE there is the ideomotor effect in the use of Facilitated Communication.  Please provide me the citation for any studies that anyone here believes proves there is the ideomotor effect with FC.  I can be reached by email at golden.arthur@gmail.com

To David Auerbach - Dr. Michael Weiss has a PhD in Psychology but he is not a “behavioral” psychologist like Professor James Todd.  Did you read the nearly 20 year old peer-reviewed article authored by Dr. Weiss et al validating Facilitated Communication?  I realize the 2001 review of FC by Professor of Special Education Mark P. Mostert was negative about the experiment of Dr. Weiss but I know Mostert is wrong (which I can explain but it would take several pages to do so).

To The Cincinnati Squid – my son at his own request at age 22 did a validation test with Dr. Howard Shane on May 3, 1994, which he “failed.”  BTW, in 1977 my then 5 year old son was the first child with nonverbal autism evaluated by Dr. Howard Shane at Boston Children’s Hospital and in 1982 Dr. Shane designed an AAC program for my son.  Dr. Shane was obviously an expert in autism for many years by 1994 and I later realized that he designed a test of FC in the early 1990’s (as the expert witness to defend a parent against sexual abuse charges) that my son could not pass because of his autism.  Privately, Dr. Shane admitted that his test did not consider one possible variable and I immediately told him that my son already told me that variable was relevant.

Overall, I am very concerned by the factual errors by many of the commenters  about Facilitated Communication, which are too numerous for me to try to explain.

blog of Brian Hughes of January 5, 2016


my comment:

Brian – as the current President of the international Stress and Anxiety Research Society (STAR), I presume that you are well aware that persons with nonverbal autism are often subject to extreme anxiety. While a blog comment is not the appropriate place for a scholarly discussion of these matters, let me simply state that clever autism experts, such as Dr. Howard Shane, were able to design “tests” in the early 1990’s that no one with nonverbal autism could pass, including my own then 22 year-old son Ben on May 3, 1994, not because they could not communicate but due to their autism. Others who were not so clever, such as Dr. Peter Eisen in 1979 in Melbourne, Australia, conveniently misplaced any data that validated the Facilitated Communication (references available on request). I understand Professor of Special Education Mark Mostert is insistent that special education practice must be based on experimental research, but what if there is research fraud?